Comments on: Flexcover 0.50 released on Google Code

By: Automation with Flexcover and FlexUnit | Allen Manning

Automation with Flexcover and FlexUnit | Allen Manning — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:15:17 +0000

[...] thanks to Joe Berkovitz and Alex Uhlmann for creating Flexcover and opening it to Google Code. With Flexcover, [...]

By: James Setaro

James Setaro — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:05:52 +0000

This looks like just what the doctor ordered. I am going to show this some developers we have using flex, thanks for the post.

By: Code Coverage for ASUnit « ActionScribe

Code Coverage for ASUnit « ActionScribe — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:57:26 +0000

[...] (of Adobe Consulting) and Joe Berkovitz haven’t been resting on their laurels. With the release of FlexCover 0.50 a few months ago the Flash world finally has a decent code coverage tool. I’ve been using it [...]

By: joe

joe — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:05:53 +0000

Yes, it is possible to automate tests like this offline with flexcover-0.50 — it is a very important capability. In order to do so, you need to do the following:

1. start the CoverageViewer app from Ant and pass the .cvm file on the command line, plus the -output option to specify the .cvr file to which the report will be written.

2. have the unit tests call CoverageManager.exit() when they are done, rather than System.exit() or fscommand(”quit”). This ensures that all coverage data is flushed correctly before the program terminates.

By: Julian Payne

Julian Payne — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:55:16 +0000

Joe,

I will certainly test any online publication system when you have it.

For your second point, what I am trying to do is to run the unit tests during my nightly builds (using a system similar to antennae by running the flash player and communicating the results via sockets). Is it possible to run the unit tests “offline” like this and save the results so that they can then be displayed in my maven site?

Thanks,

Julian

By: joe

joe — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:44:27 +0000

Hi Julian –

#1: We are thinking about how to best publish results online, and I see your point about the SWF. It’s a great idea and I’ll look into it.

#2: when you open a .cvm file, all percentages will always be at 0% because you have not captured any data yet. Once the coverage viewer is open on a .cvm, you can run the instrumented program and flexcover will collect the coverage data from it. At that point you will see the percentages change on the fly.

By: Julian Payne

Julian Payne — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:03:27 +0000

This does look cool :-)

I have 2 comments:

1. It would be great to have a SWF as well as an air application so that the results can be published in a nightly build (ala maven2)?

2. I have tried using 0.50 with my maven2 build environment and it creates a .cvm file but all the methods are at 0%, any clues why this might be?

Thanks,

Julian Payne
Visualization R&D
ILOG S.A. Sophia Antipolis, France

By: Ryan O'Connell

Ryan O'Connell — Fri, 23 May 2008 20:11:39 +0000

Wow, this is a really useful tool. Provides a nicer interface than the default profiler. I was trying to use this on my project (its an AIR app). I ran into this nasty byte code verification error: (Can you help?)

verify global/vu.core.util::isNullOrEmptyString()
stack:
scope:
VerifyError: Error #1013: Cannot call OP_findproperty when scopeDepth is 0.
locals: global String?
0:debugfile “/Users/oconnell/hosted-services/dev/main/concerto/website/flex/concerto2;vu/core/util;isNullOrEmptyString.as”
stack:
scope:
locals: global String?
4:debugline 26
stack:
scope:
locals: global String?
6:findpropstrict coverage

(Note — this is now entered as Issue 8 — JB)