Comments on: Software Modelling: Soft Focus or Hard Edges? http://joeberkovitz.com/blog/2007/05/17/software-modelling-soft-focus-or-hard-edges/ Just another WordPress weblog Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:04:58 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Troy Gardner http://joeberkovitz.com/blog/2007/05/17/software-modelling-soft-focus-or-hard-edges/comment-page-1/#comment-126 Troy Gardner Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:01:30 +0000 http://www.joeberkovitz.com/blog/?p=46#comment-126 Good post. I agree that agile and MDA are just two different tools in the toolbelt, part of the stuff I'm working on are to reduce the impedance mismatch between the various aspects (IA, design, code) and faciliate easy change, as even the best models may dash against the side of a road on a curve nobody could see. Bring ducktape and a ruler ;) http://troyworks.com/blog/?p=22#respond Good post. I agree that agile and MDA are just two different tools in the toolbelt, part of the stuff I’m working on are to reduce the impedance mismatch between the various aspects (IA, design, code) and faciliate easy change, as even the best models may dash against the side of a road on a curve nobody could see.

Bring ducktape and a ruler ;)

http://troyworks.com/blog/?p=22#respond

]]> By: TroyWorks » Blog Archive » Agile vrs Model Driven Design http://joeberkovitz.com/blog/2007/05/17/software-modelling-soft-focus-or-hard-edges/comment-page-1/#comment-125 TroyWorks » Blog Archive » Agile vrs Model Driven Design Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:37:36 +0000 http://www.joeberkovitz.com/blog/?p=46#comment-125 [...] Here’s another vote for where Cogs and the related framwork comes in handy http://joeberkovitz.com/blog/2007/05/17/software-modelling-soft-focus-or-hard-edges/#more-55 [...] [...] Here’s another vote for where Cogs and the related framwork comes in handy http://joeberkovitz.com/blog/2007/05/17/software-modelling-soft-focus-or-hard-edges/#more-55 [...]

]]> By: joe http://joeberkovitz.com/blog/2007/05/17/software-modelling-soft-focus-or-hard-edges/comment-page-1/#comment-124 joe Fri, 18 May 2007 13:43:20 +0000 http://www.joeberkovitz.com/blog/?p=46#comment-124 A model drawn on a whiteboard has some interesting aspects that a model in a document lacks: * it has a "semantic soundtrack": as the model is drawn, an explanation is nearly always given with it. * it unfolds in time: as someone draws and talks, the model appears in stages that make sense, rather than appearing all at once. * it is communal: anyone in the conversation can walk up to it and change it * it has a dead-simple user interface and zero cost, in contrast to most modelling software tools. These all highlight a really important angle of modelling -- using models as useful conversational playthings, rather than as static representations of a "perfect" world. A model drawn on a whiteboard has some interesting aspects that a model in a document lacks:

* it has a “semantic soundtrack”: as the model is drawn, an explanation is nearly always given with it.

* it unfolds in time: as someone draws and talks, the model appears in stages that make sense, rather than appearing all at once.

* it is communal: anyone in the conversation can walk up to it and change it

* it has a dead-simple user interface and zero cost, in contrast to most modelling software tools.

These all highlight a really important angle of modelling — using models as useful conversational playthings, rather than as static representations of a “perfect” world.

]]> By: Erik http://joeberkovitz.com/blog/2007/05/17/software-modelling-soft-focus-or-hard-edges/comment-page-1/#comment-123 Erik Fri, 18 May 2007 00:12:55 +0000 http://www.joeberkovitz.com/blog/?p=46#comment-123 The most useful applications of UML I have tend to be on a whiteboard -- visible, malleable, and transient. The most useful applications of UML I have tend to be on a whiteboard — visible, malleable, and transient.

]]>